From inequality to equality: Evaluating normative justifications for affirmative action as racial redress
Abstract
We investigate whether, and to what extent, Nozick’s entitlement theory and Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness can normatively ground affirmative action policies. Our findings are that, whereas the Nozickean project offers no guidance for large-scale redress, the Rawlsian position supports affirmative action as redress, but only in its softer forms. Therefore, if one accepts the assumptions of equal liberty and fairness upon which Rawls’s theory is based, one is left with two alternatives: either to reject Rawls’s theory because it fails to support quota systems, or to accept Rawls’s theory and reject quota systems as a legitimate form of redress. We argue for the latter option.ÂDownloads
References
Benatar, D. 2008. Justice, diversity and racial preference: A critique of affirmative action. The South African Law Journal, 125(2):274-306.
Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. London: Routledge.
Goff, E. L. 1976. Affirmative action, John Rawls, and a partial compliance theory of justice. Cultural Hermeneutics, 4:43-59.
Korsgaard, C. 1996. Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leibbrandt, M., Finn, A. & Woolward, I. 2012. Describing and decomposing post- apartheid income inequality in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 29(1):19-34.
Lundahl, M. & Petersson, L. 2009. Post-apartheid South Africa: An economic success story? UNU-WIDER: Helsinki.
Nagel, T. 2003. John Rawls and affirmative action. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 39:82-84.
Nagel, T. 1973. Equal treatment and compensatory discrimination. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2:348-363.
Nattrass, N. 1999. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission on business and apartheid: A critical evaluation, African Affairs, 98:373-391.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Rapaport, E. 1981. Ethics and social policy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11:285-308.
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Republic of South Africa, The South African Department of Labour. 1998. Employment Equity Act, No. 55 of 1998. [Online] Available: http://www.labour.gov.za [Accessed 1 September 2014].
Republic of South Africa, The South African Department of Labour. 1998. Summary of the Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998, issued in terms of Section 25(1). [Online] Available: http://www.labour.gov.za [Accessed 1 September 2014].
Roe, M. & Siegel, J. 2011. Political instability: Effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39:279-309.
Seekings, J. 2007. Poverty and inequality after apartheid (CSSR Working Paper No. 200). Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.
South African Institute of Race Relations. 2013a. White men still top of the pay scale. [Press release]. [Online] Available: http:// irr.org.za/reports-and-publications/media-releases/White%20men%20 still%20top%20of%20the%20pay%20 scale.pdf/at_download/file [Accessed 1 September 2014].
South African Institute of Race Relations. 2013b. 2013 South Africa Survey. [Online] Available: http://irr.org.za/reports- and-publications/south-africa-survey/ south-africa-survey-online-2012-2013 [Accessed 1 September 2014].
Statistics South Africa. 2012. Census 2011. [Online] Available: http://www.statssa. gov.za/publications/p03014/p030142011. pdf [Accessed 4 November 2014].
Taylor, R. S. 2009. Rawlsian affirmative action. Ethics, April:476-506.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 1998. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume 4, Chapter 2, ‘Institutional Hearing: Business and Labour.’
Van der Berg, S. 2011. Current poverty and income distribution in the context of South African history. Economic History of Developing Regions, 26(1):120-140.
Van Wyk, M. W. 2001. Equal opportunity and equal liberty. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
Valls, A. 1999. The libertarian case for affirmative action. Social Theory and Practice, 25(2):299-323.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publisher's version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publisher's version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in the African Journal of Business Ethics, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://ajobe.journals.ac.za/pub) may be found.
The following Creative Commons license applies:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.