Balancing corporate and social interests: Corporate governance theory and practice
AbstractThe claim is often made that corporate governance is an attempt to balance corporate interests with individual and societal interests. Lord Adrian Cadbury, who chaired the Cadbury Commission that produced the Cadbury Report on Corporate Governance in the UK, claims that the objective of corporate governance “is to align as nearly as possible the interests of individuals, corporations and society”. This paper will test whether this claim can be substantiated on the theoretical and practice level. To test this claim on the theoretical level the concept of corporate governance will be analysed in order to determine whether the said balance is implied by the concept of corporate governance. In order to determine whether the claim find support in corporate governance practices around the world, six continental or regional reports on the relationship between business ethics and corporate governance, representative of the various regions of the world (Africa, Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Japan, Latin America and North America), will be analysed critically. On the basis of this conceptual and corporate governance practice analysis an assessment will be made of whether corporate governance is about “align[ing] as nearly as possible the interests of individuals, corporations and society”.
Bebchuk, L.A. & Roe, M.J. (1999). ‘A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance’. Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 127-170.
Bedicks H. & Arruda C.C. (2005). ‘Business ethics and corporate governance in Latin-America’. Business & Society, 44(2), 218-228.
Branson, D.M. (2001). ‘The uncertain prospect of ‘global’ convergence in corporate governance’. Cornell International Law Journal, 34, 321-362.
Coffee, J.C. (1998). Inventing a corporate monitor for transitional economies: The uncertain lessons from the Czech and Polish experiences. In K.J. Hopt, et al. Comparative corporate governance: the state of the art and emerging research. New York: Oxford University Press: 67-138.
Coffee, J. C. (1999). ‘The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications’. Northwestern University Law Review, 93(3), 641-707.
Collier, J. & Robberts, J. (2001). ‘An ethic for corporate governance?’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 67 - 71.
Demise N. (2005). ‘Business ethics and corporate governance
in Japan’. Business & Society, 44(2): 211-217.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications’.
Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Evan, w. & Freeman, R. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In, T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.) Ethical theory and business
(4th edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Fallon, w. & Treleaven, L. (2006). From protagonists to
partners: Participative research in the corporate landscape. [Online] Available at: http://www.education.up.ac.za/alarpm/PRP_pdf/ Fallon&Treleaven.pdf. (Accessed 4 September 2006).
Garrett, A. D. (2004). ‘Themes and variations: The convergence of corporate governance practices in major world markets’. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 32, 147-174.
Gedajlovic, E.R. & Shapiro, D.M. (1998). ‘Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries’. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 533-553.
Goodpaster, K.E. (1993). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In, T.I. white (Ed.) Business Ethics: A philosophical reader. New York: MacMillan.
Hansmann, H. & Kraakman, R. (2001). ‘The end of history for corporate law’. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2): 439- 468.
IoD (2002) King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2002, Johannesburg: Institute of Directors IoD.
Kimber D. & Lipton P. (2005). ‘Corporate governance and business ethics in the Asia-Pacific region’. Business & Society, 44(2): 178-210.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F. & Shleifer A. (1999). ‘Corporate ownership around the world’. The Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517.
La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. & Vishny R. (2000). ‘Investor protection and corporate governance’. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.
Monks, R. A. G. & Minow, N. (2004). Corporate governance (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Nestor, S. & Thompson, J. K. (2000). Corporate governance patterns in OECD economies: Is convergence under way? [Online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/10/1931460. pdf (Accessed 4 September 2006).
Reed, D. (2002). ‘Corporate governance reforms in developing countries’. Journal of Business Ethics 37: 223-247.
Reinecke, M.P.A. (1996). Effective corporate governance: A South African perspective. Unpublished masters dissertation. Johannesburg: Rand Afrikaans University.
Romano, R. (1998). Empowering investors: A market approach to securities regulation. In, K.J. Hopt, et al. Comparative corporate governance: The state of the art and emerging research. New York: Oxford University Press: 143-217.
Rossouw G.J. & Sison, A.J.G. (Eds.) (2006). Global perspectives on the ethics of corporate governance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Rossouw, D., Van der watt, A. & Malan, D. (2002). ‘Corporate governance in South Africa’. Journal of Business Ethics, 37: 289-302.
Rossouw, G.J. (2005). ‘Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa’. Business & Society, 44(1): 94-106.
Ryan L. (2005). ‘Corporate governance and business ethics in North-America: The state of the art’. Business & Society, 44(1): 40-73.
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.w. (1997). ‘A survey of corporate governance’. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Smerden, R. (1998). A practical guide to corporate governance. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
wieland J. (2005). ‘Corporate governance, value management, and standards: A European perspective’. Business & Society, 44(1), 74-93.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publisher's version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publisher's version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in AJOBE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://ajobe.journals.ac.za/pub) may be found.
Authors publisher's version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
The following license applies:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.