Challenges in the sociology of business ethics: Researching whistleblowing

  • Tina Uys Department of Sociology, University of Johannesburg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/5-1-47
Keywords: Ambiguity, Business ethics research, Descriptive ethics, Embeddedness, Methodological challenges, Motives, Sensitivity, Whistle-blowing

Abstract

The main research focus of the sociology of business ethics is on (i) the moral foundations of people’s behaviour, both within and outside the business context, (ii) how compatible or contradictory these behaviours are and (iii) how stable a society or component of a society would be if self-interest is the main governing principle, without being constrained by moral discipline. This entails providing accurate descriptions and explanations of ethical situations. Whistle-blowing research is used to examine the methodological challenges of business ethics researchers. The analysis demonstrates the importance of an integrated multi-strategy approach that would facilitate an investigation of the motivations and decision processes of individual actors in the larger social context, especially within the organisation. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abend, G. 2008. ‘Two main problems in the sociology of morality’. Theory and Society. 37: 87-125.

Akande, A. (2001). ‘Risky Business: South African Youths and HIV/AIDS Prevention’, Educational Studies, 27(3):237-256.

Alford, C.F. 2001. Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power. London: Cornell University Press.

Bauer, M. 1996. ‘The Narrative Interview: Comments on a Technique for Qualitative Data Collection’; at: 64.233.167.104/search?q=cache: M26b7iIgNgwJ. Available from: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodology Accessed on 23 February 2007.

Ben-Yehuda, N. 2001. Betrayals and Treason: Violations of Trust and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Westview.

Bok, S. 1980. ‘Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibilities.’ Ethics Teaching in Higher Education 11:277-295.

Brewer, G.A. and Selden, S.C. 1998. ‘Whistle blowers in the Federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(3): 413-39.

Bryman, A. 2001. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

Calland, R. and Dehn, G. 2004. Whistleblowing around the World: Law, Culture and Practice. Cape Town: The Open Democracy Advice Centre and London: Public Concern at Work.

Catania, J.A., Turner, H., Pierce, R.C., Golden, E., Stocking, C., Binson, D. and Mast, K. (1993). Response bias in surveys of AIDS-related sexual behaviour, in Ostrow, D.G. and Kessler, R.C. (eds.). Methodological issues in AIDS behavioural research. New York: Plenum Press.

Cohen, S. 2001. States of denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.

Coughlan, R. 2005. ‘Employee Loyalty as Adherence to Shared Moral Values’, Journal of Managerial Issues, 17 (1): 43-57.

Davis, M. 2004. ‘Some Paradoxes of Whistleblowing,’ In Beauchamp, T.L. and Bowie, N. (eds.). Ethical Theory and Business, seventh edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Frederickson, H.G. 1993. Ethics and Public Administration, (M.E. Sharpe, London).

Hendry, J. 2001 ‘After Durkheim: An Agenda for the Sociology of Business Ethics’. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4): 209-218.

Hoffman, W.M. and Moore, J.M. 1982. ‘What is Business Ethics?’ A Reply to Peter Drucker’, Journal of Business Ethics 1: 293-300.

Hunt, G. 1998. ‘Whistle-Blowing.’ Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics 4: 525-535.

Glazer, M.P. and Glazer, P.M. 1989. The Whistleblowers: Exposing Corruption in Government and industry. New York: Basic Books.

Hendry, J. 2001. ‘After Durkheim: An agenda for the sociology of business ethics’. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3/4): 209-217.

Jackson, J. 1992. ‘Coming to Ethical Terms. Motive and Morality’. Business Ethics. A European Review 1(4):264-266.

Johnson, R.A. 2003. Whistleblowing: When it Works- and Why. London: Lynne Riener Publishers.

Jubb, P.B. 1999. ‘Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation’, Journal of Business Ethics 21: 77-94.

Kloppers, P. 1997. ‘Behoort die whistle blower beskerm te word?’ Stellenbosch Law Review, 8(2): 237-248.

Lampert, N. 1985. Whistleblowing in the Soviet Union: Complaints and Abuses under State Socialism London: Macmillan.

Latimer, P. 2002. ‘Reporting suspicions of money laundering and ‘whistleblowing’: The legal and other implications for intermediaries and their advisers’. Journal of Financial Crime, 10 (1): 23-29.

Miceli, M.P. and Near, J.P. 2008. Whistleblowing in Organizations. New York: Routledge

Miceli, M.P. and Near, J.P. 1992. Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. New York: Lexington Books.

Miethe, T.D. 1999. Whistleblowing at Work: Tough Choices in Exposing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse on the Job. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Park, H. and J. Blenkinsopp 2009, ‘Whistleblowing as planned behavior – A survey of South Korean police officers’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85: 545-556.

Perry, J.L. 1993. ‘Whistleblowing, Organizational Performance, and Organizational Control’, in H.G. Frederickson, (ed), Ethics and Public Administration, London: M.E. Sharpe, London. pp 79-99.

Petersen, J.C. and Farrell, D. 1986. Whistleblowing: Ethical and Legal Issues in Expressing Dissent. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.

Quirk, A. and Rhodes, T. 1998. ‘Unsafe protected sex’: Qualitative insights on measures of sexual risk. AIDS Care, 10(1): 105-114.

Rossouw, D. 2004. Developing Business Ethics as an Academic Field. Ben Africa; Johannesburg.

Rossouw, G.J. 2001. ‘Research in business ethics.’ Koers, 66(3): 197-211. Rossouw, G.J. 2002. Business Ethics in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Rothschild, J. and Miethe, T. D. 1994. ‘Whistle-Blowing as Resistance in Modern Work Organizations’, in J.M. Jermier, D. Knights and W.R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, London: Routledge. pp. 252–73.

Rothschild, J. and Miethe, T. D. 1999 ‘Whistle-Blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation’, Work and Occupations 26(1): 107–28.

Singer, M., Mitchell, S., and Turner, J. 1998. ‘Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistleblowing and Need-for-cognition’, Journal of Business Ethics 17: 527-541.

Somers, M.J. and Casal, J.C. 1994. ‘Organizational Commitment and Whistleblowing’, Group and Organization Management 19(3): 270-284.

Starck, K. 2001. ‘What’s Right/Wrong with Journalism Ethics Research?’. Journalism Studies 2(1): 133-152.

Trevino, L.K. and Weaver G.R. 1994. ‘Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two?’ Business Ethics Quarterly 4(2): 113-125.

Uys, T. 2002. ‘Students, sex and Aids: A methodological controversy’. Society in Transition, 33(3): 382-402.

Uys, T. 2008. “Rational loyalty and whistleblowing: The South African context.†Current Sociology, 56(6): 907-924.

Uys, T. and Senekal, A. 2008. Morality of principle versus morality of loyalty: The case of whistleblowing. African Journal of Business Ethics 3(1): 38-44.

Vinten, G. 1994. Whistleblowing: Subversion or Corporate Citizenship? London: Paul Chapman.

Vanderkerchhove, W. 2006. Whistleblowing and Organizational Social Responsibility: A Global Assessment. England: Ashgate Publishing.

Westin, A.F. 1981. Whistleblowing! Loyalty and Dissent in the Corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Widmalm, S. 2008. Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West. Sage: New Delhi.

Wilmot, S. 2000. ‘Nurses and Whistleblowing: The Ethical Issues’, Journal

of Advanced Nursing 32(5): 1051-1057.

Zeller, R.A. 1993. ‘Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques to Develop Culturally Sensitive Measures’, In D.G. Ostrow. and R.C. Kessler (eds.), Methodological Issues in AIDS Behavioural Research, New York: Plenum Press.

Published
2014-07-23
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1
Section
Articles

This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.

Authors may use the publisher's version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers. 

A copy of the authors’ publisher's version may also be hosted on the following websites:

  • Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
  • Institutional webpage.
  • Authors Institutional Repository. 

The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in the African Journal of Business Ethics, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI.  Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://ajobe.journals.ac.za/pub) may be found. 

The following Creative Commons license applies:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.