They can be choosers: Aid, Levinas and Unconditional Cash Transfers

  • Julio Andrade Stellenbosch University
Keywords: Levinas, UCTs (Unconditional Cash Transfers), aid programmes, Malawi


In this paper I seek to critically examine UCT’s and CCT’s and consider how a Levinasian ethics might offer normative guidelines to evaluate such aid programmes. Such an analysis will serve to both critique and supplement the traditional utilitarian analyses of such programmes. In so doing, this paper also hopes to contribute to the business ethics literature in which a Levinasian ethics may be brought to bear on real world problems. I proceed by enlisting Jordaan (2009) who argues that a Levinasian ethical politics can be instantiated in institutional designs by allowing a more complex representation of the other’s alterity. Two UCT programmes are interrogated in light of this finding – the first, a UCT programme in a community in Vietnam; the second, a joint CCT/UCT programme targeting adolescent girls in Malawi, designed to test the efficacy of conditionality to achieve certain.


Alford, C.F. 2004. Levinas and political theory, Political theory, 32(2), pp.146-171.

Baird, S., Ferreira, F. H. G., Özler, B., Woolcock, M. 2013. Relative Effectiveness of Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers for Schooling Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews 2013:8 DOI: 10.4073/csr.2013.8 ISSN

Baird, S., McIntosh,C., Özler, B. 2011. ‘Cash or Condition: Evidence from a cash transfer experiment.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, pp.1709-1753.

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell

Bernasconi, R. 2002. ‘What is the question to which ‘substitution’ is the answer?’ in The Cambridge Companion to Levinas eds. S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 234-251.

Bevan, D. & Corvellecc, H. 2007. The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to managerial ethics.’ Business Ethics: a European review, 16(3), pp.208-219.

Buchman, N., Field. E.,Glennerster,R., Nazneen,S., Pimkina,S., and Sen, I. 2017 "Power vs Money: Alternative Approaches to Reducing Child Marriage in Bangladesh, a Randomized Control Trial" Working Paper available at

(Accessed 14 September 2018)

Byers, D. & Rhodes, C. 2007. Ethics, alterity, and organizational justice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), pp.239-250

Critchley, S. (1999). The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Critchley, S. (2012). Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. London: Verso.

Cullity, G. 2004. The Moral demands of affluence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dale, K. 2012. The employee as ‘Dish of the Day’: The ethics of the consuming/consumed self in human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), pp.13-24

Derrida, J. 1978. ‘Violence and Metaphysics’ in Writing and Difference, translated by A. Bass. London: Routledge (2001), pp 97-192.

Desmond, J. 2007. Levinas: beyond egoism in marketing and management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), pp.227-238

The Economist 2013. (accessed 14 September 2018)

Fiszbein, A. & Schady, N. 2009. Conditional cash transfers reducing present and future poverty World Bank available at (accessed 14 September 2018)

Forstorp, P. 2007. Fundraising discourse and the commodification of the Other. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), pp.286-301

Gates Foundation. 2018 (accessed 14 September 2018)

Give Directly 2018. (accessed 14 September 2018)

GiveWell. 2018 (accessed 14 September 2018)

Greer, D. 2009 29 July 2018)

Hanlon, J., Barrientos, A. & Hulme,D. 2010.Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the South .West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

Introna, L.D. 2007. Singular justice and software piracy. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), pp.264-277

Jones, C. 2003. ‘As if business ethics were possible, “within such limits”…’ Organization 10(2), pp.223-248.

Jordaan, E. 2009. ‘Cosmopolitanism, freedom, and indifference: A Levinasian view’. Alternatives, 34, pp.83-106.

Karamail, E. 2007. Has the guest arrived yet? Emmanuel Levinas, a stranger in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), pp.313-321

Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An essay on exteriority. trans. Lingis, A. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. 1985. Ethics and Infinity: conversations with Philippe Nemo. trans. Cohen, R.A. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. 1998. Otherwise Than Being, or Beyond Essence. Translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. 2001. Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas. Ed J.Robbins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

Mansell, S. 2008. Proximity and rationalisation: The limits of a Levinasian ethics in the context of corporate governance and regulation. Journal of Business Ethics 83, pp.565-577.

McMurray,R.,Pullen,A. & Rhodes, C. 2010. Ethical subjectivity and politics in organizations: A case of health care tendering. Organization, 18(4), pp.541-561

Perpich, D. 2008. The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Project Literacy. 2018. (accessed 14 September 2018)

UN. 2018. (accessed 14 September 2018)

Rachels, S. 2007. The elements of Moral Philosophy 5th edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Singer, P. 1972. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(3), pp.229-243.

Staricco, J.I. 2016. Fair trade and the fetishization of Levinasian ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 138, pp.1-16