The role of the audit committee in strengthening business ethics and protecting stakeholders' interests

Ben Marx, Gideon Els

Abstract


It is imperative for companies to do business ethically and to respect the rights of all the company’s stakeholders, while still being accountable to the shareholders. This article examines evidence from a literature and empirical study conducted on the role of audit committees in strengthening business ethics and protecting stakeholders’ interests. The study found that the majority of audit committee chairs believe their audit committees to be effective in discharging their responsibilities regarding business ethics. Of concern, however, are the findings that a large number of audit committees are not reviewing compliance with their companies’ code of ethics, although most of them are reviewing or providing a channel for whistle-blowing. The inspection of the annual reports further indicated a lack of disclosure by the audit committees on their responsibilities regarding business ethics. 


Keywords


audit committees; business ethics; Second King Report on Corporate Governance (King II); Third King Report on Corporate Governance (King III); stakeholder interest; stakeholder theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Breckenridge, R.G. 2004. Modelling ethical corporate governance in terms of the King Report. Unpublished dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Brewer, F.C. 2001. Corporate audit committee effectiveness. Unpublished dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Bromilow, C.L. & Berlin, L. 2005. Audit committee effectiveness – what works best (3rd edition). Altemonte Springs: The IIA Research Foundation.

Deloitte. 2006. The Duties of Directors. Deloitte, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Els, G. 2007. Utilising continued professional development of ethics amongst prospective chartered accountants. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Ernst & Young. 2005. Audit committee benchmarking survey. Ernst & Young, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Ernst & Young. 2006. Fraud: Six myths that hold companies back. EYGM Limited. Score Retrieval File No. CX0015.

Ernst & Young. 2007. Audit committee roles in fighting fraud: A network compendium. [Online]. Available: http://www. tapestrynetworks.com/documents/Tapestry_EY_Euro_ ACLN_Feb07_Insights2.pdf. Accessed on 4 November 2008.

Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Gatamah, K. 2006. The corporate enterprise in Africa: Governance, citizenship and social responsibility. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3): 139–144.

Griseri, P. 1997. In search of business ethics. London: Financial Times Pitman Publishing.

Hadden, L.B. 2002. An investigation of the audit committee and its role in monitoring information technology risks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale-Davie, FL.

Heath, J. & Norman, W. 2004. Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post- Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247–265.

Henning, E., Gravett, S.E. & Van Rensburg, W. 2005. Find your way in academic writing (2nd edition). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Holsti, O.R. 1969. Content analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hutton-Wilson, D. 2001. Corporate governance: Critical challenges for South Africa. Management Today, 17(7): 8–13.

Institute of Directors (IoD). 2002. King II Report on Corporate Governance. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Institute of Directors (IoD). 2009. King III Report on Corporate Governance. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). 2002. The accounting profession and the fight against crime. [Online]. Available: http://www.ifac.org/council/ anticorruptionpaper.tmpl. Accessed on 4 November 2008.

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). 2005. Code of ethics for professional accountants. International Federation of Accountants, New York, NY

Jackson, K.T. 2006. Breaking down the barriers: Bringing initiatives and reality into business ethics education. Journal of Management Education, 30(1): 65–89.

JSE Limited (JSE). 2007. Ground rules for the management of the FTSE/JSE Africa index series. [Online]. Available: http://ftse.jse.co.za/does/general_information/FTSE_JSE_ Ground_Rules.pdf. Accessed on 4 November 2008.

JSE Limited (JSE). 2008. Indices constituents. [Online]. Available: http://fin.jse.co.za/findata/ indicesconstituanse.asp?sector s=J300&y=115-123-85-65-100-125-119-89-82-66. Accessed on 27 February 2008.

Kidder, R.M. 2001. There’s only ethics ... Based on a keynote speech presented to the Human Services Council of Northeast Florida in Jacksonville on 1 October 1992, Institute for Global Ethics, FL.

King, M.E. 2006. The corporate citizen. Johannesburg: Penguin Books.

Knechel, R.W., Salterio, S.E. & Ballou, B. 2007. Auditing assurance and risk (3rd edition). Canada: Thomson South Western.

Knights, D. & O’Leary, M. 2005. Reflecting on corporate scandals: The failure of ethical leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4): 359–366.

Landman, W. 2006. Wat sake-etiek behels [What does business ethics entail]. Finweek. (February 9, 2006). p. 49. Leeman, M. 2002. What corporate citizenship and shareholder activism can reasonably be expected from trustees. South Africa: Frater Asset Management.

Maree, K.W. & Radloff, S. 2007. Factors affecting ethical judgement of South African chartered accountants. Meditari, 15(1): 1–18.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2005. Audit committee effectiveness – what works best (3rd edition). Report by PricewaterhouseCoopers (sponsored by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) Research Foundation, Altemonte Springs, FL).

Punt, W. 2006. Vyf stappe tot ‘n kultuur van etiek [Five steps to a culture of ethics]. Finweek. (February 9, 2006). p. 50.

Robertson, J.C. 1993. Auditing (7th edition). Boston: Irwin. Robins, F. 2006. Corporate Governance after Sarbanes- Oxley: An Australian perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(1): 34–48.

Rossouw, D. 2002. Business ethics in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rossouw, D. 2003. The governance of ethical risk. Financial Mail (supplement). (June 13, 2003).

Rossouw, D. & Van Vuuren, L. 2004. Business ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rossouw, D., Prozesky, M., Van Heerden, B & Van Zyl, M. 2007. Ethics for accountants and auditors. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schäckermann, U. 2007. Making sense of business ethics. Grant Thornton, South Africa.

Schwartz, M.S., Dunfee, T.W. & Kline, M.J. 2005. Tone at the top: An ethics code for directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1): 79–100.

Thomas, A. 2005. Corporate governance: A key challenge for South African leaders. Aboveboard: Africa’s Global Chronicle on Governance, Leadership and Ethics, August– September, 1: 76–81.

Thomas, E. 2008. Business ethics – do we need them? BusinessBrief. (April/May 2008). p. 30.

Van Vuuren, L. 2003. Identifying and managing human resource risk. Financial Mail. (supplement). (June 27, 2003).

Voogt, T.L. 2008. Phase 1 of The SAICA CFO of the Future Project: A process report. Proceedings of the value 2008: Creating, developing and delivering value in Africa in the global context (Sun City, South Africa).

Weiss, R. 2005. Audit committee characteristics and monitoring effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New York, New York, NY.

Williams, P. 2006. An ethical dilemma. Accounting and Business. (February 2006). p. 14.

Williams, P. 2007a. Why can’t audit committees behave as they should? Accounting and Business. (June 2007). p. 14.

Williams, P. 2007b. Teaching ethics. Accounting and Business.

(July/August 2007). p. 12.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/4-1-59

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 0976-3600 (on-line) ; ISSN 1817-7417 (print)


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2014.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help