Is stakeholder theory really ethical?

Okechukwu Enyinna

Abstract


Stakeholder theory claims to promote moral values in business and this claim is generally accepted. Yet, literature shows that the theory is fundamentally strategic and only incidentally normative. This paper explores the assumptions of philosophical pragmatism that underpin the theory and concludes that the theory does not qualify as normative, since its conception of morality is basically hypothetical. 


Keywords


Instrumental theory; normative theor; pragmatism; separation thesis; stakeholder theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., and Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 153-90.

Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (2), 157-69.

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.

Evan, W. M., and Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Ethical Theory and Business (pp. 101–105). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Freeman, R. E. (1984`). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. (pp. 46). Boston: Pitman;.

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409-21.

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233-6.

Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Ethical issues in business. 7th ed. (pp. 38-48). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53-73.

Harris, J. D. and Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 541-8.

Hasnas, J. (1998). The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 19-42.

Hasnas, J. (2013). Whither stakeholder theory? A guide for the perplexed revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 47-57.

Jones, T. M. and Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-21.

Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.

Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 285-98.

Moore, G. E. (1959). Principia Ethica. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., and de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 403-45.

Purnell, L. and Freeman, R. (2012). Stakeholder theory, fact/value dichotomy, and the normative core: How Wall Street stops the ethics conversation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 109-16.

Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 213-32.

Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30, 426-38.

Wempe, B. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis: Precision after the decimal point? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 549-53.

Wicks, A. C. and Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9, 123-40.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/7-2-38

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 0976-3600 (on-line) ; ISSN 1817-7417 (print)


Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2014.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help